|
|
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:53:25 +1200
Nicolaas Hawkins <grumpy.mole@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:27:31 -0700, Craig <netburgher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote in <news:mxqsk.7765$np7.4890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Or do we bag it and focus on '09?
> >
> > I'd like to see this puppy off the ground and I'd like to help.
> >
> > This is what the process has been:
> > <http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/2008/2008PL-Procedures.php>.
> > What I'm wondering is can (should):
> >
> > - we push out a PL08 or is it too late?
> > - it be under some kind of abbreviated rules to facilitate it for
> > 08?
> >
> > And, of course, how to divvy up the task. I'm sure that we can
> > make this methodical and lightweight enough such that we can come
> > up with yet another great compilation for the internet community.
>
> I believe the idea of PL2008 should be abandoned for lack of time, and
> efforts concentrated on producing a PL2009 some time in the first
> quarter of 2009 - remembering that PL is a list, not a CD. The CD -
> if such is to be produced - could follow at a more leisurely pace,
> with the work not necessarily done by the same people who moderated
> the production of the list.
I agree, though I think a PL2009 could be arrived at in the last
quarter of 2008 so it would be available for all of 2009. But BeAr is
the only one who's said he'd consider taking point, so it would all
need to happen at a time when he can put in the work.
|
|